USE comments appear to be well researched and bring the unique perspective of a designer, developer, and distributor of satellite radio. USE makes a number of assertions that we have no way of verifying, such as Sirius giving sole distributor rights to Directed Electronics (DCI) and XM giving sole distributor rights to AudioVox. The conclusion is that if there is a merger, then there will be a sole distributor of satellite radios. A sole distributor, according to USE, would stifle innovation, which would harm the public interest. USE references a recent DEI presentation where DEI 'referred to itself as Sirius' "[e]xclusive retail hardware partner"' as proof of its assertion that Sirius has selected DEI as its sole distributor.
USE cites Hush-a-Phone and Carterfone as precedents for an "open access network".
USE makes the points that once merged, subsidies can be used to prevent others from entering the manufacturing business. Or, there may be no subsidies, raising the cost to consumers. Also, there will be no incentive to give subsidies to retailers in order to make the selling of satellite radios profitable, again raising the cost of hardware to consumers.
USE also notes its lawsuit against Sirius, stating that the "performance of its agreement with Sirius was interdicted by Sirius' determination to use a single supplier for its network's satellite receivers, Directed Electronics, Inc."
The meat of USE's comments is here:

xm sirius satellite radio stocks patent patents trademark copyright experimental licenses wcs eas invest investing fcc
Jump to :: Satellite Radio Techworld Home Page ::
0 comments:
Post a Comment